金闲评
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
  First Chinese banking acquisition in US

Published: October 8 2007

China’s pioneering US bank acquisition ticks all the right boxes. Minsheng Bank has gained a US presence in a business it knows well: its target, UCBH Holdings, is a San Francisco-based community bank serving Chinese family businesses. Better still, Minsheng has (so far) avoided both paying a hefty premium and ruffling feathers on Capitol Hill – a rare feat for a Chinese acquirer beating a path to the US.

All told, Minsheng will pay about $200m for 9.9 per cent of San Francisco- based UCBH in two phases. The initial 4.9 per cent bite is priced at the previous 90-day average closing price; the second may command a slim premium. That is pocket change for Minsheng. UCBH is roughly one-tenth its size in terms of assets, and the first cheque will have little impact on the Chinese lender’s healthy capital adequacy ratio. Should any strains appear later – subject to approvals, Minsheng has the option to increase its stake to 20 per cent – the lender can tap two of the world’s more buoyant capital markets. Minsheng’s Shanghai-listed shares have almost doubled this year, in spite of a massive block sale in March, and it is mulling a listing in Hong Kong.

Has Minsheng blazed a trail for peers to follow? Do not hold your breath. Unlike most rivals, it is privately owned and was ready to settle for a minority stake. That may have soothed US regulators, who are more likely to bridle at advances by state-controlled entities. UCBH is also a special case. Its need for cash meant it was prepared to sell the initial slug of stock at market price. Ironically, the cash raised will soon return to China, to fund UCBH’s purchase of Shanghai-based Business Development Bank. The whiff of reciprocity doubtless pleased the Americans. Beijing, which sees overseas acquisitions as a way to balance the waves of foreign money entering China, may have a different view.

Labels:

 
Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

ARCHIVES
August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / August 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / July 2012 / December 2012 /


Powered by Blogger