金闲评
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
  CNOOC VOTE STOPS DEPOSIT OF FUNDS WITH STATE PARENT
By Robin Kwong and Tom Mitchell in Hong Kong
Tuesday, April 03, 2007, FT

Shareholders at CNOOC have voted to stop the Chinese oil company from continuing to deposit funds with its state-owned parent – a practice criticised by shareholder activists as risky and unnecessary.

The vote, which took place last Friday, stops Hong Kong-listed CNOOC from continuing to keep funds with CNOOC Finance, the financing arm of its state-owned parent, without additional shareholder approval. CNOOC had about Rmb3.5bn ($453m) with CNOOC Finance at the end of November last year.

One key concern was the fact that there was no explicit guarantee from CNOOC's parent for the funds parked in CNOOC Finance.

“The crux of the issue is risk,” said Dean Paatsch, Asia Pacific vice-president for Institutional Shareholder Services, which does not hold shares in CNOOC but advises institutions that do. “This is not something you would expect a listed entity to do without compelling commercial logic.”

ISS advised investors to vote against the practice.

Corporate governance activist David Webb, a director of the Hong Kong bourse, said the vote was a step towards stamping out the practice of listed companies depositing funds with their parents.

It is common among Chinese state-owned enterprises with Hong Kong-listed subsidiaries, as it gives the parent control over the listed companies' finances.

“It's partly the control-freak mentality of the Chinese government, who haven't yet understood that when you list [a company] it has to be self-standing,” he said. “In the long run [stopping this] will be good for China's capital markets.”

CNOOC, which said it respects the decision, nonetheless contends the deposit arrangements are safeguarded by checks and balances and benefit the company and shareholders.

“They allow the company to handle transactions flexibly and efficiently,” said Fu Chengyu, chairman.
 
Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

ARCHIVES
August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / August 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / July 2012 / December 2012 /


Powered by Blogger