金闲评
Thursday, February 01, 2007
  Beijing accuses museum of cutting China roots
Financial Times
By Mure Dickie in Beijing and Kathrin Hille in Taipei
Published: January 30 2007
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/13d77b7c-afef-11db-94ab-0000779e2340.html

Beijing has accused Taiwan of seeking to sever the priceless Chinese cultural treasures held in the National Palace Museum in Taipei from their national roots.

China’s state media has denounced as “exceedingly dangerous” a planned revision of the charter of the museum, which is home to the most precious artefacts from Beijing's fabled imperial Forbidden City, accusing Taiwan of pursuing a policy of “de-Sinification”.

The angry denunciation reflects the deep suspicions that still underlie relations across the Taiwan Strait.

Beijing bristles at any move by Taiwan that seems to challenge its position that the democratic and autonomous island is an inseparable part of the Chinese nation.

While cross-strait tensions have eased over the past two years amid the plummeting political influence of Chen Shui-bian, Taiwan’s independence-minded president, Beijing remains convinced that he and his ruling party are pursuing a policy of “creeping independence”.

“Taiwanese administrative authorities . . . are trying to dilute and blur the reality that Taipei’s Palace [Museum] comes from the Beijing palace, and to sever the blood ties between Taiwanese and Chinese culture,” the overseas edition of the People’s Daily newspaper said.

“These ‘de-Sinification’ measures of the Taiwanese authorities not only twist and trample on museum and artefact research, but are also politically exceedingly dangerous,” the Communist party paper said.

The Chinese complaints centre on Taiwanese plans to revise the charter of the museum, the repository of Forbidden City treasures brought to the island by Kuomintang forces defeated on the mainland by Mao Zedong’s Communists in the late 1940s. Taiwan’s cabinet recently submitted to parliament a draft amendment of the museum’s charter which no longer states at the top that the artefacts in it come from Beijing’s Forbidden City.

The museum said this was merely a technical change in administrative law. “That the artefacts in the National Palace Museum come from the Forbidden City in Beijing . . . is a historical fact which we have never tried to hide or deny,” it said.

The Chinese criticism comes as the Taipei Palace Museum completes a $21m (€16bn, £11bn) expansion and renovation meant to cement its status as one of the world’s most important museums. However, the museum’s shift away from its traditional role of simply showcasing Chinese artistic excellence – and particularly its embrace of expressions of a distinctively Taiwanese identity – is seen as deeply subversive in Beijing.

Chinese scholars routinely reject claims that Taiwan’s culture has been influenced by the island’s indigenous Polynesian inhabitants, its extended Japanese rule and its very different history of European colonial contacts.

“If you strip out such Chinese things as language, characters, personal and place names, literature, history and customs, what would be left of Taiwanese island culture?” the People’s Daily said dismissively.

It called for vigilance against any further efforts to excise Taiwan’s Chinese roots. “When slanders pass from mouth to mouth, people will believe there is a tiger in the market place. When evil people incite the crowd, the buzz of mosquitoes turns to thunder,” it said.

 
Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

ARCHIVES
August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / August 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / July 2012 / December 2012 /


Powered by Blogger